A) The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
B) The National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996
C) The Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998
D) The Market Reform Act of 1990
E) The Class Prohibition Act of 1997
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Regulation of the activities of brokers,dealers,and advisers.
B) Adoption of rules to regulate securities transactions.
C) Enforcement of securities laws.
D) Criminal prosecution of alleged violations.
E) Regulation of trades on securities exchanges.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Rule 2c.-5
B) Section 32c.
C) Rule 10b-5
D) Rule 5c.-2
E) Section 15b.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Offerors
B) Issuers
C) Unaccredited purchasers
D) Underwriters
E) Accredited purchasers
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Warrants and stocks are securities,but debentures and bonds are not.
B) Stocks,warrants,and debentures are securities,but bonds are not.
C) Debentures,warrants,bonds,and stocks are all securities.
D) Stocks and bonds are securities,but debentures and warrants are not.
E) Stocks,warrants,and bonds are securities,but debentures are not.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Sophisticated
B) Accredited
C) Superior
D) Approved
E) There is no specific term to describe Annaliese,as she is considered the same as any other investor.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) No,unless the cautionary language in the prospectus was hidden or unclear.
B) Yes,the cautionary statements only protect against forward-looking statements,not misrepresentations about the past or present.
C) No,because the prospectus contained the appropriate language.
D) Yes,because DotCom was not a public company and thus the safe harbor provision is inapplicable.
E) No,but only if DotCom can prove that the investor had been provided with a copy of the prospectus.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes,an long as it was not an express offer to sell securities.
B) Yes,as long as the information was truthful.
C) Yes,as long as the information included the names of the underwriters.
D) No,because it did not go to all prospective shareholders.
E) No,an issuer cannot offer to sell securities during the prefiling period.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) They are appointed by a majority vote of the Senate.
B) They are appointed by a majority vote of the House of Representatives.
C) They are appointed by the president.
D) They are appointed by a two-thirds vote of the Senate.
E) Each state has one appointee appointed by the governor of each state.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The Securities Act Amendments of 1990
B) The Securities Enforcement Remedies and Penny Stock Reform Act of 1990
C) The National Securities Market Improvement Act of 1996
D) The Investment Company Act of 1940
E) The Market Reform Act of 1990
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
B) The Market Reform Act of 1990
C) The Securities Acts Amendments of 1990
D) The National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996
E) The Securities Enforcement Remedies and Penny Stock Reform Act of 1990
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Resales of securities and intrastate issues are exempt transactions,but limited offers are not.
B) Limited offers,intrastate issues,and resales of securities are all exempt transactions.
C) Limited offers are exempt transactions,but intrastate issues and resales of securities are not.
D) Limited offers and resales of securities are exempt transactions,but intrastate issues are not.
E) Intrastate issues and limited offers are exempt transactions,but resales of securities are not.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Rafal is incorrect because the SEC criminally prosecutes some violators although the action would only be a misdemeanor.
B) Rafal is correct because there are no criminal penalties for violating the 1933 act.
C) Rafal is incorrect because the SEC criminally prosecutes some violators,and a violation of the act is considered a felony.
D) Rafal is correct in that the SEC itself would not send Isaiah to prison,but the SEC could recommend criminal action to the Department of Justice resulting in imprisonment for up to five years for a violation.
E) Rafal is correct in that the SEC itself would not send Isaiah to prison,but the SEC could recommend criminal action to the Federal Bureau of Investigation resulting in imprisonment for up to ten years for a violation.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Any change in the financial status of the company.
B) A new product,process,or discovery.
C) A change in dividends.
D) A change in the status of litigation against the company.
E) A contract for the sale of corporate assets or for the purchase of assets.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Issuers must plan to use at least 80 percent of the profits within the state.
B) Issuers must do at least 80 percent of their business within the state.
C) Issuers must conduct at least 80 percent of advertising in the state.
D) Issuers must have at least 80 percent of their assets within the state.
E) Issuers must have their main offices in the state.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) She was not convicted of insider trading,but she went to prison for convictions relating to statements made to SEC investigators.
B) Charges were dismissed after she agreed to repurchase all shares of stock.
C) She was not convicted of insider trading and sentenced to prison.
D) She pled guilty to lesser offenses on all counts,paid a large fine,and all charges were dismissed.
E) After a jury trial she was found innocent of insider trading and did not go to prison for anything.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Rule 25.
B) Section 5
C) Section 10b.
D) Section 15a.
E) Rule 2
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 21 - 40 of 90
Related Exams